The Power of Checklists, or How I Got to Sleep On The Job and Get Paid for It!
There are only four types of officer. First there are the lazy, stupid ones. Leave them alone, they do no harm… Second, there are the hard-working intelligent ones. They make excellent staff officers, ensuring that every detail is properly considered. Third there are the hard-working, stupid ones. These people are a menace and must be fired at once. They create irrelevant work for everybody. Finally, there are the intelligent lazy ones. They are suited for the highest office. - General Von Manstein on the German Officer Corps

I once worked in a gas turbine test laboratory in Switzerland. I was responsible for running a test bed. When I arrived there we were failing, and having to repeat, every second test. It was a shambles. I thought it was shameful but everyone else seemed to shrug their shoulders.
I began to record the reasons for each failure. The majority of them turned out to be operator errors - forgetting to turn on equipment, forgetting to set the correct parameters, leaving parts out, running the test bed to failure. Each time something went wrong, I asked myself one of the most powerful questions that you can ever, ever ask yourself, “What can I do to make sure that this never, ever happens again?”
This question ensures that you go beyond responding to the symptoms of a problem and get to the root cause. If you can’t eliminate the root cause, then you must see what you can do to control the causes so that you don’t end up with results that you don’t want.
In the case of the lab, I revised many functions so that repetitive problems were totally eliminated. For those that could not be eliminated, I created a check list for each operator to go through and sign before, during and after a test. Each time that a new cause of failure occurred, I asked my powerful question and dealt with it - often by adding a new feature on the checklist.
The net result was that test failures due to avoidable operator errors fell to zero (apart from one time when an operator felt that he knew better and didn’t follow the checklist). At least that was the case on my watch. I left that company and returned on a visit a year or two later. No one used the checklists anymore and tests were frequently repeated.
Every time that you get a result that you don’t want then I recommend that you ask yourself, “What can I do to make sure that this never, ever happens again?” If you carry out a lot of relatively routine functions but keep having snarl ups then I recommend that you create a checklist and follow it diligently. It will save you a great deal of fuss and bother and it will boost your productivity tremendously.
I give one warning: it can make life easy to the point of boring. If you are someone who takes pride in being a hard worker then this tactic is not for you. In my experience hard workers, when left to their own devices, insist on making work hard. The guy who ran the lab when I arrived prided himself on being a hard worker (Man, we had so much conflict! He was the guy who didn’t follow the checklist and ruined my near zero record).
With him in charge, it was no wonder that we were working our asses off and getting abominable results. I doubled the productivity of the lab and got it to run so smoothly that it was boring. We’d set the tests up, let them run, sit back and then me and my buddy would while away the hours voting on ‘Hot or Not’. I had so little to do that I was even able to set up a secret bed in the basement for a little R&R after lunch.
So let’s do a little morality poll here. Was my behavior (after doubling the productivity of the lab and making it run so smoothly that I effectively made myself redundant) lazy, feckless and irresponsible, or was it the well-deserved fruit of a job done thoroughly and excellently? How about another question - would you respect and wish to be the hard worker (busy, busy, busy but grossly ineffective) or the Paganist worker (highly effective on a fundamental level first and then deservedly slothful)?








#1 - Permalink Eli December 5th, 2008 at 9:26 amThis post is very true.
The head of the math department at my university once told us, “A good mathematician is intelligently lazy.” He was a true Paganist.
And I would always choose to take the Paganist worker route. It’s a question of “Smarter vs. Harder”. Or to put it another way, “there’s no reason to take an hour to do something that could take ten minutes.”

#2 - Permalink ultragreen December 6th, 2008 at 2:25 amOne of my buddies is always talking about your blog at work - finally came and checked it out today, nice work! I’m subscribing to your rss feed - keep on posting!

#3 - Permalink branderson December 7th, 2008 at 1:52 pmI believe it was your then employer who was irresponsible. He should have quickly noticed the improvements and correspondingly promoted you.
If the employer can’t be bothered to consistently promote progress then the employee shouldn’t feel bothered to consistently supply progress.

#4 - Permalink Louis Burns December 8th, 2008 at 9:34 amDepends on the employer. If they care about continuous improvement, they would have noticed when you hit a ceiling and found something else for you to be useful with.
If they didn’t care as it appears in your situation then you have the discretion to do what you want once you’ve finished your work - whether that’s start a blog or side business or voting on Hot or Not. Of course you’d want to do 125% of what was expected of you so you’d be set once promotion time finally came around.
One skill that’s useful is to get good at looking busy for the latter type of company. Some people get really good at that.

#5 - Permalink admin December 8th, 2008 at 9:44 amYes, unfortunately I’ve mostly worked for pointy headed bosses in dilbert land, but even the rare good ones normally had their hands tied when it came to promoting or rewarding outstanding performance. Most corporations simply have no process for doing this, or else they give far too little discretion and latitude for middle management to give appropriate rewards.